<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spin versus Facts on Nuclear &#8220;Modernization&#8221; and New START</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gdmig-plutoniumcafe.org/2010/04/spin-versus-facts-on-nuclear-modernization-and-new-start/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gdmig-plutoniumcafe.org/2010/04/spin-versus-facts-on-nuclear-modernization-and-new-start/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: New START ratification: &#8220;not a bipartisan but a non-partisan challenge&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gdmig-plutoniumcafe.org/2010/04/spin-versus-facts-on-nuclear-modernization-and-new-start/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>New START ratification: &#8220;not a bipartisan but a non-partisan challenge&#8230;&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plutoniumcafe.org/?p=605#comment-147</guid>
		<description>[...] in the US Senate regarding ratification of the treaty; I&#8217;ve discussed this on several occasions, as have a number of other people. We&#8217;re all tentatively predicting ratification of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the US Senate regarding ratification of the treaty; I&#8217;ve discussed this on several occasions, as have a number of other people. We&#8217;re all tentatively predicting ratification of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
